Prey: Where does it fit in the Predator timeline?

Prey: Where does it fit in the Predator timeline?

Prey

The announcement of the new film in the Predator franchise, Prey, has prompted fans of the deadly alien hunter to wonder how this new chapter in the saga will relate to the myth of Yautja. A legitimate curiosity that has therefore led to the question of where to place Prey in the Predator timeline, considering that this new chapter of the franchise leaves the present to go and tell a story set prior to the progenitor of the saga, Predator.

Subscribe now at Disney Plus for € 8.99 per month or € 89.90 per year

Where does the new film of the franchise, Prey, fit in the Predator timeline?

The first meeting between Yautja and humans seen on the big screen dates back to 1986, when a fierce Arnold Schwarzenegger, in the role of the Dutch special soldier, encountered a Predator during a secret mission in the forests of Central America. Although we do not have precise indications on this, it is reasonable to assume that this adventure was set in 1987, while for its sequel, Predator 2, we have a precise date: 1997. Although it was shot in 1990, the second chapter of the franchise was set in near future, staging an alien hunt within an urban guerrilla context, a mirror of the social tensions of the period.

| ); }
After these two clashes, the Yautja return as the only protagonists with Predator, set in 2010, where a group of humans is used as the target of a ferocious hunt on an alien planet, while in The Predator, year 2018, the Yautja return to Earth again, unleashing their ferocity in Colorado.

For the return of lethal alien predators, it was decided to set Prey in a remote period of the Predator timeline: 268 years before the battle between Predator and Dutch. Prey, in fact, will be set in 1719, in the Great Plains, the vast American plains where a tribe of Comanche, at the time considered as lethal hunters, will collide with a Yautja.

Leading this Comanche tribe will be the young Naru (Amber Midthunder), who after being raised as an inferior by her own people, will have to stand up to lead the warriors of her tribe to face the Predator that haunts their hunting grounds. The intent of the screenwriters is to confront two hunters, armed differently and with different warrior philosophies, placing him at the center of an all-out struggle. It is interesting to note that Prey will be the first film in the franchise not to be set in the present day, but it seems to want to be a first step in building a more complex relationship between humans and Yautja, an aspect already dealt with in the comic dimension of Predator, where they were tell stories that pitted them against humanity at different times, from World War II to Victorian London.


Also in Alien Vs Predator we wanted to create a past between humans and Yautja, showing what looked like an ancient temple in the center of a Predator hunting ritual, where a first hint of lore of the alien race is created.

The Disney Plus offer

Disney + annual Disney + monthly 89.99 € / year 8 , 99 € / month SEE OFFER SEE OFFER






‘I was the prey’: Woman subjected to ‘relentless grooming’ by Met police officer

Ms Y says PC Phil Hunter would call her from his bed at night to make sexual comments and ask her out on dates (Getty Images/iStockphoto)


A woman says a police officer sent her sexual messages while subjecting her to a “relentless campaign” of grooming before going on to stalk her.


Speaking exclusively to The Independent, Ms Y, who can not be identified, said PC Phil Hunter would call her from his bed at night to make sexual comments and ask her out on dates.


The accusations only came to light after Mr Hunter, a Metropolitan Police officer, was found guilty in 2020 in a separate case of gross misconduct for having a sexual relationship with a suicidal woman.


Ms Y said her ordeal began in August 2017 when he came to her home to carry out a welfare check after she reported her ex-partner to police for stalking and domestic abuse.


“He was really nice to me,” Ms Y added. “He said ‘I get it, I understand what you are going through’. He gave me his telephone number. He said ‘this is my personal number’. He said ‘we are going to be friends and I am going to look after you’ and he gave me a big hug. I thought he was a nice man. I was beyond vulnerable.”


She said Mr Hunter told her she should not have contact with family or friends over the next three months - insisting he was the only person she could rely on, even telling her not to contact other police officers.


Ms Y said it later transpired Mr Hunter never logged any of the information she gave him about her domestic abuse case. But he later disclosed the home address of her ex-partner to her, she said.


Ms Y added: “He said to me that he could arrange for police officers to go round and give him a hard time. A sexual relationship with me was Mr Hunter’s goal.”


She said Mr Hunter then abruptly disappeared at the end of November 2017 and stopped contacting her. Later, in February 2018, professional standards, the department that investigates police officers and staff accused of misconduct, contacted her about another alleged victim of Mr Hunter’s and asked her to give a statement about him.


“I defended him,” Ms Y said. “I was convinced he was lovely. The police downplayed the case hugely. They said they would extradite my own case if I defended him. I gave a statement supporting him.”


Story continues


In August 2019, Mr Hunter started contacting her again, at which point she said it was clear he knew “everything” about her.


She said: “He knew where my family lived. He could quote off addresses. Also of friend's places. It is unclear whether he got it from speaking to colleagues who were dealing with my case or from police computer systems.”


Ms Y reported him to the Metropolitan Police but claims they failed to deal with her complaint properly - adding that she reported him 32 times over a year before they assigned someone to look into the case.


She said she later found out Mr Hunter’s alleged first victim had tried to kill herself “because of Hunter’s coercive control”.


Ms Y added: “She is still alive. He was contacting her saying exactly the same things to me at the same time. He disappeared out of my life when he started being investigated for his relationship with the other woman.


“I have nothing but support for the Met but the Met doesn’t want to admit how bad the issue is with predatory police officers.


She has since received an apology from the police for how her case was handled. But she wants Commander Catherine Roper, the first officer she reported Mr Hunter’s behaviour to in 2019, to say sorry to her personally.


Text messages Mr Hunter sent to Ms Y, seen by The Independent, say: “You are a beautiful person” and “You can be as naughty as you like with me”.


Mr Hunter retired from the Met Police in July 2019 while he was being investigated for gross misconduct and became a licensed black cab driver. He has since had his driving licence revoked.


Ms Y said her allegations against him were not given to the team investigating him over his relationship with the suicidal woman until after the misconduct hearing. On the contrary, the character witness statement she made when she still considered him to be a good man was used at the tribunal as part of his defence case despite her spending nine months trying to revoke the statement.


The fresh allegation comes after a string of criticism of Met Police for its handling of the murder of Everard in March 2021 by serving officer Wayne Couzens


Commenting on Mr Hunter’s gross misconduct ruling, Deputy Assistant Commissioner Bas Javid, from the Met's Directorate of Professionalism, said: “There is no place for this kind of behaviour in the Met and it is right that the officer involved would have been dismissed, if he had not already resigned.”


He added: “During the investigation of the complaint made by the individual [Ms Y] about the misconduct process we identified that the method of communication with the individual was not properly routed, and this caused delays in information being passed. We rectified this, and did not identify any misconduct from any officers or staff.”


Mr Javid noted the Independent Office for Police Conduct reviewed this and “agreed with our findings”.





Powered by Blogger.